close

I do not cognize what Web 2.0 channel. Some say it's merely a buzzword utilised by new Internet start-ups, power-driven by undertaking capitalism, as a way to create hype; several say it's a new sort of design; one say it's the new method of web development, i.e. Ajax and Ruby on Rails; and few say it's simply the subsequent manoeuvre towards a Semantic Web. I lack of faith there'll ever be accord until what Web 2.0 is until is is was.

This event came backbone up after I proposed assorted web logo/web dev blogs leaving the 9rules Web town. Many web designers and web developers dislikable this proposal, as Web 2.0 (or in 9rules l33t articulate Web ) is likewise a method of pattern and enlargement.

O'Reilly and MediaLive in the beginning coined the term Web 2.0, and they too common my interest over and done with the non-defintitive explanation.

Useful pages:

There isn't a queue as to what is Web 2.0 and what isn't. This makes categorising blogs gauche. If a journal is astir pleasant circinate cranny effects: is it more or less Web 2.0? If a diary is almost new start-ups: is it roughly speaking Web 2.0? If a web log is more or less Ruby development: is it something like Web 2.0? For the early and last I would categorize them as decoration and development, respectively, but I'm technically in no doubt that designers and developers, respectively, would also categorize themselves as Web 2.0.

Then again, does a row entail to be drawn? Perhaps Web 2.0 is the equilibrium relating design, start and business organisation. But is Venture Capital and Web 2.0 the aforesaid thing? Nope, but they are connected.

Perhaps 9rules needs more communities. So as well as company you have scheme capitalism; instead of designing you could have web shape and vivid design; instead of planning you could have software system upgrading and web development; and alternatively of Web you could have WebApps (and later slot the relic linking web image and web perfection).

Custom patterns:

I imagine by the circumstance the web20osphere decides what Web 2.0 is; the web30osphere2.0 will be trying to desire what Web 3.5 is.

arrow
arrow
    全站熱搜
    創作者介紹
    創作者 qjjtomas 的頭像
    qjjtomas

    qjjtomas的部落格

    qjjtomas 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()